|
Written
by Salim-Javed!
Sriram
Raghavan, Direction 1987
The
master writer and director Billy Wilder, whilst
addressing some film students gave some tips
on screenwriting. The first of them said: The
audience is fickle. You got to grab them
by the throat and never let go.
Cut
to the early seventies, when two hungry (and
perhaps angry) young men – a failed actor
and an assistant director – got together
and grabbed the throats of Hindi Cinema viewers.
The actor was Salim Khan (you can spot him in
F. C. Mehra’s Professor (1962)
and Vijay Anand’s Teesri Manzil (1966))
while the assistant director was Javed Akhtar.
They met on a film set, formed the Salim-Javed
team and literally wrote a new chapter in the
annals of Hindi Cinema.
‘Written
by Salim-Javed’ on the credits of any
film was a promise – of a taut story,
terrific scenes, vivid characters, superbly
crafted transitions, memorable dialogue and
above all an ability to combine the flamboyant
givens of mainstream cinema with earthy realism
that connected with every viewer from the very
first row to the balcony. Something for both
the masses and the classes, as our trade papers
say.
A
terrific idea and a terrifying blank page. That’s
the beginning of every good film. Undoubtedly,
there have been great writers in Hindi Cinema
before the Salim-Javed phenomenon. But every
one of them would happily or grudgingly agree
that this was the duo that was responsible for
making the writer a superstar. They gave recognition,
respect and dignity to the craft of screenwriting.
They got the writer’s name on the poster.
And every writer here would applaud when I say
that they were often paid more than the stars.
I’ll just try and write about why I love
their work. I’ll try and talk about their
superb craft and economy of writing, their influences,
their inspirations and their impact on film-making
ever since.
It
was not that there were no good writers before
Salim-Javed. Wajahat Mirza wrote Mother
India (1957), Mughal-e-Azam (1960)
and Gunga Jamuna (1961), Nabendu Ghosh
wrote several classics for Bimal Roy including
Sujata (1959) and Bandini (1963)
besides Abhimaan (1973) for Hrishida,
K. A. Abbas wrote Shri 420 (1955),
Bobby (1973) and other films for Raj
Kapoor, Akhtar Mirza wrote Naya Daur (1957)
and Waqt (1965) for B R Chopra, Rajendar
Singh Bedi, Abrar Alvi, O P Dutta, Dr Rahi Masoom
Reza and a whole lot of others including the
prolific Sachin Bhowmick and Gulzar who wrote
some memorable films like Anand (1970).
There were also Writer-Directors like Vijay
Anand, Nasir Husain and Manoj Kumar.
The
studio system of the 40s and 50s had dissolved
into another system where every prominent director/production
house had a select group of writers working
in an atmosphere of insulation and camaraderie
– the Story Department. I have no idea
how they actually functioned. Perhaps they were
a group of people who read a lot of books, brainstormed
all day and eventually zeroed in on an idea.
The late 60s and early 70s saw the bulk of Hindi
cinema dominated by the romantic social drama.
The style of working then was to broadly select
a story, think of song situations, a basic scenario
to embellish the song situations, add some comedy
moments and to ensure that there was an action
climax. Oh yes. Whatever the genre of the film,
the climax had to have action.
The
Salim-Javed story began in one such story department
at Sippy Films. Ramesh Sippy was making his
first film Andaaz (1971) with the most
prolific and popular writer of the time, Sachin
Bhowmick. One day, two young men came to meet
him and said they wanted to narrate a script.
They said, “You may not necessarily do
it but we assure you that you will want to hear
it to the end.” Ramesh Sippy said to himself
that these guys sure are cocky. But they were
eager and confident. So he said, fine. Go ahead.
Mr Sippy recounts: “I
was tired and was lying down as they began to
narrate. And midway I found myself sitting up…
and towards the end I was leaning forward, listening
intently to everything they said. I immediately
called my cashier and issued two cheques. They
joined my story department. That was the first
time I could see the whole film, smoothly flowing
scene to scene in my head.”
Cut
to a couple of years later. I was a kid then…
And I got a complete narration of Yaadon
Ki Baarat (1973). Not from Salim-Javed
though. I got it from my mom. We weren’t
allowed too many movies then. But my parents
had just seen the movie. I asked her to at least
tell me the story. And she did – scene
by scene! How the boys separated, how they met
often but kept missing the chance to realize
they were brothers and how ultimately they met
and how the villain got his foot stuck in the
railway tracks and was run down by a train.
I was a kid, but I too could see the whole
film in my head.
I
have not seen Death Rides a Horse (1967)
but in one line, it’s the story of a boy
seeking revenge for his parents’ killings.
Call it audacity, or sheer writing skill but
Salim-Javed managed to sell this one-line story
to both Prakash Mehra (Zanjeer (1973))
and Nasir Husain (Yaadon ki Baraat).
They wrote two entirely different screenplays
with the same idea. The Prakash Mehra film is
dark, a gritty film noir shot mostly on locations;
while the Nasir Hussain flick is a musical,
a love story, a lost-and-found saga, a caper
thriller and yes, also a revenge story! Zanjeer
too has songs, it has a love story, but nothing
gets in the way of the mood of the movie. I
love the scene where Jaya Bhaduri shows Vijay
some curtains for the house and he says yeah
lets put lots of curtains so that we shut ourselves
out of whatever hell is happening out there.
And she points out a picture of a lush landscape
in a calendar and says that place originally
had a volcano. The volcano erupted one day and
only then did the land become fertile. Effective,
evocative writing! If Zanjeer follows
the rule of less is more, Yaadon Ki Baraat
makes you salivate for more. I can happily confess
that even today as I watch its climatic title
song and the three brothers unite, I get all
misty eyed...
If
Salim-Javed took one idea and made two movies,
they were to also do a total opposite. They
took classics of Hindi Cinema – Gunga
Jamuna and Mother India, and wonder
of wonders, through their amalgamation created
a third classic, Deewaar (1975)!
Jean
Luc Godard said that if a film has four to five
good scenes, the audience is usually quite satisfied.
George Lucas said, a good film should have 60
terrific two-minute scenes. Deewaar
has a total of 95 scenes and it’s quite
impossible to list favourites because they are
all so damn good. It’s a film without
an ounce of fat. The character of Parveen Babi,
for example, is introduced after the interval
and she has only seven scenes. And yet she leaves
a lasting impact. As writers, whilst working
on our own scripts, we often feel inadequate
and hopelessly untalented. If we want to feel
even worse, please note that Salim-Javed wrote
Deewaar in just 18 days! And in a film
full of memorable lines, I must mention Vijay’s
first meeting with Samant, his first assignment.
He sees Samant and his goons entering a lift.
Vijay stops the closing doors of the lift with
his foot. The gang stares suspiciously at him.
Moving lift. Suddenly Vijay stops the lift midway.
The goons pull out their guns in a jiffy. Vijay
says relax, I want to talk business with Samant
Saab. Samant says you want to talk business
come to my office. Vijay says: Suna hai
lift ke darwazon ke kaan nahin hote… Why
don’t we hear such dialogue today???
Sholay
(1975) has 62 scenes. Maybe this is where
George Lucas got his figures from. I’m
not going to praise this film. Rather, let me
try and write about the things that bother me.
Let’s go back to the time when the film
had not yet been made. It was just a four line
idea.
The
first thing that I’d have really worried
about is, how am I going to keep it hidden from
the audience that Thakur does not have hands.
That has to be my secret till I dramatically
reveal it at the interval point. Oh yes, there
is Mr Sippy’s fantastic blocking and Sanjeev
Kumar’s performance, but right now it’s
just words on paper. If the viewer guesses,
or more probable, tells the next show viewers…
Hell, there goes my interval point.
The
second thing that would surely have bothered
me is, after the Hema Malini dance Jab Tak
Hai Jaan when Samba is about to kill Veeru
and we see Jay has arrived. Jay has Gabbar at
gunpoint. Veeru takes a gun, lots of bullets
and leaves with Basanti. Why don’t they
take Gabbar along? And remember, their mission
was to get Gabbar, dammit! In popular cinema
terms, it’s emotional logic. Meaning what?
Meaning logically, that’s what they would
do but the makers are taking us on an emotional
journey. We are so worried for Basanti and Veeru
that we are oh so glad that Jay has come and
that the immediate threat is gone, we want them
to just get away and save themselves. We aren’t
thinking logically. We are thinking emotionally.
Likewise
with the cut hands and the blanket. In a good
film, a whole hall can come out holding a secret.
It happened with The Crying Game (1992).
It happened with The Sixth Sense (1999).
But of course, it has to all happen on paper
first.
The
journey of a four-line idea to a full-fledged
screenplay is an arduous and fantastic process,
where the writer has to draw from within and
from outside. The world of Salim-Javed was full
of as many outside influences as it was of their
own lives, their own struggles coupled with
their imagination, ambition and intent. One
can detect influences ranging from James Hadley
Chase and Harold Robbins to Conrad’s Lord
Jim, from our own films, literature, poetry,
culture and mythologies. In their best work,
Salim-Javed took ideas from fictional and real
sources but they always had an original take
on it. They worked within the rigid conventions
of Hindi cinema of the time but they created
scripts that were unique, realistic and contemporary.
Mera Gaon Mera Desh (1971) and Khote
Sikkey (1974) were made before Sholay
and both films had crooked but likeable thieves
being enlisted to protect a village. Sholay
has multiple reference movies but it’s
still an original work. Very much like Raiders
of the Lost Ark (1981) or Pulp
Fiction (1994). Tarantino said it best
when he said he stole from every single movie
ever made.
Seeta
aur Geeta (1972), Zanjeer, Yaadon ki
Baraat, Majboor (1974) and Haath
Ki Safai (1974) were all big hits. And
with Deewaar and Sholay releasing
in 1975, the Salim-Javed duo had achieved a
success so far unimaginable for mere writers.
They impacted the film industry like no other
writers before them had done. Credit titles
had their names, just before the Producer and
Director. Posters brandished their names. So
what made them so different? What made them
click?
Film
historians say they caught the mood of the nation,
somewhat disillusioned by the state of affairs
in the country. They would say that better.
I can only speak from the point of view of a
school-going kid then. I guess all kids are
rebels at heart. We loved Vijay for his attitude,
his bravado, his confidence and cool. We felt
his anger, his angst and we wanted to be like
him.
Many
filmmakers of the time were making as good or
better stories for the screen. Looking back
at the movies I love and watch repeatedly, I
think it’s not the stories but how they
were told that finally grabs the viewer. As
writers, Salim-Javed never forgot the viewer
within themselves. Critically, Salim-Javed didn’t
think their audience was dumb! In fact, any
filmmaker who considers the audience dumb is
actually saying he’s dumb himself because
in a sense, he’s the film’s first
viewer. I don’t think Salim-Javed ever
said to each other the audience won’t
accept this, that they will not understand this.
As
sheer craftsmen, their strong points were economy,
pace, dialogue, visual language of story-telling,
sharp characterization and clever transitions.
To love Salim-Javed is not just to appreciate
great films but also to enjoy and discover the
essential 70s entertainer – Haath
Ki Safai, Chacha Bhatija (1977),
Don (1978) to name some.
We
live in a time when a producer will happily
dish out a huge sum of money to an item song,
an item set and the item girl but balk when
the writer demands his price or even talks about
his fee. We live in times when it’s easier
for a Director/Producer to convince an actor
with a DVD of a film rather than a bound script.
We live in times when every conceivable factor
other than a script is responsible for a film’s
success. Massive marketing, flooding the market
with prints or simply a successful song can
get the required initial. Ironically, we also
live in times when every movie or novel is available
at the DVD store or the mall next door. Most
alleged writers today, at least seem
to be satisfied too easily. Maybe we’re
become too lazy even to steal. And I mean steal
from every movie ever made.
Let
me end on a quote from Javed from the Nasreen
Munni Kabir book, Talking Films. “When
I’m working as I sometimes do, in a hotel
room and writing a tragic scene, I get tears
in my eyes. When I’m writing a lighter
scene, I smile or laugh. When this scene goes
to the director, he gives it to an actor, then
the actor will perform it, the camera will film
it, an editor will edit it, then it’ll
be sent to different cities like Ratlam, Sangli
and Jabalpur. And in Jabalpur, a man who has
never met me, and will never meet me, will buy
a ticket and see the film. If I had cried in
that hotel room while writing a scene, it will
touch him. And if I hadn’t, it won’t.
Although I am not directly communicating the
scene to him, yet my insincerity or sincerity
gets conveyed in spite of all the different
interpreters. You just can’t fool people.
I don’t know how it happens but it happens
– in poetry, in short story writing, novel
writing or even when writing a letter.”
|
FEEDBACK
ON THIS ARTICLE |
What
did you think of this article? |
| |
|
Comment by :
anil mehta
thanks
|
|
Comment by :
Anil Siqueira
An absolutely superb article,
superbly expressed.
It would perhaps have been perfect, were it not for the mistakes -- in the use of some words, (wrong) punctuation, the missed chances for felicitous expression and some grammatically awkward sentences.
Pity!
|
|
Nice writeup Raghavan
Comment by :
Tulsidas Mishra
Dear Raghavan
Immensely enjoyed your article on Salim-Javed. Informed the same to my brother Chandidas over phone. He received the call when he was coming back to Mumbai , after a short vacation in Oirssa. He added the information that , you wrote this piece to read it in the Screenplay workshop in FTII.
I will just like to pass on one more related information. That , when the original script of Haathi Mere Saathi was going nowhere and the then Superstar Rajesh Khanna was anxious , someone suggested him to speak to SJ duo. And then the duo reworked the script , that way a thorough overhauling and needless to say , the film became so watchable and successful at that time. This Javed Saab told to Pratibha Advani in her weekly Interview show in Zee channel.
SJ have only written the screenplay in it, the dialouges have been written by the then top line writer Inder Raj Anand, f/o Tinu Anand.
To repeat , weldone Raghavan.
Tulsidas Mishra
Hello India programme
ETV, UKML Bld.
Ramoji City
Hyderabad
|
|
Comment by :
gadadhar puty
worth revisiting the area.
agree with raghavan.
|
|
Comment by :
Gadadhar puty
During our time, towards fag end of our course, Javed saab was scripting in Pune for Mr. Ramesh Talwar at Hotel Blue Diamond, had come to our FTII Boys' hostel in '82 (Courtesy, Mr. Raman Kumar who had played a key role in Deewaar and had got him penned lyrics for SAATH SAATH). Mr. Tej Rasaily, a senior of mine had called him to my Room, S-16 to show him: a great fan oh his stays there. They came into S-16 and to the embarrassment of both of us, Javed Saab discoverd a blown up picture of SALIM-JAVED pasted on my cupboard door.
Whenever I make a film for theatre release, I always apply lessons learnt from his films.
PS: I am eager to see a film, SARHADI LOOTERE the film in which Salim saab was acting and Javed saab was doing things as a clapper boy. And just because the direcor couldnot afford a regular dialogue writer, asked Javed saab to write them. And here, somewhere on the set of the film, something led to a great happenning in the indian cinema: the SALIM-JAVED duo.
|
|
Comment by :
murali
SUPERB
|
|
a frutfull gift
Comment by :
shirish sharma
sir,
since my school days i have been a huge fan of salim-javed,later when i decided to study screenplay writing in ftti this duo was my sourse of inspirationi try to read as much as i can about the team and disuss in the class,fouruantly we get so many examples of deewar in our class.i hear want to disuss deewar,i dare to say that deewar is one of the best screen plays everwiteen in hindi fims.it's a text book for me ,have watched it annonyms times.when i saw it first i felt i learnt halph of the script writing,was very happy.then saw it again felt the same thing.till the date i have seen it annonyms times and evey time i get to learn somthing new about the craft of script writing.either it's trilogy of dilouge inn the "bhai tum sign karoge"seen or its "doston ke nam bhi hua karte hain" and how how can we forget "main aaj bhi phenke hue paise nai uthata davarsab. what a pay off of the child hood set up,i lke each n every thing in the fim but specialy i love the secne in which davar gives the command to vijay and goes out we see vijay with his legs on table and davar telling jaychand about vijay's past .this scene is contains a history, struggle in it.a surviver comes on the top.the way they have used set up and pay off,scene design,every thing superb.deewar is a text book for every aspiring script writer.though it had influences of ganga jamuna and mother india,but even that it was a comletly new and revent film which raised the contemprory problems.treatment,mood every thing was newand unique in it's way.and above all what this duo gave for wrters the "vijay template" i dare to say that being a script writing student i researched a lot and came to know that almost every "character centerd sceernplay" came after deewar follows the vijay template in some ways or the other.i get some resemblece of dewar in almost every charactor centered scenplay after deewar.though i think that sj wre not concious about three act structure but how beuatifully they have incorporated it with story and gave a new feel to sceen play it's just amazing.
i m very glad to read about salim javed and and thankfulll to you.i got mor wisdom and insight after reading this.just tired to exprees my self want to more from u by salim javed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|